Why isn't anyone sueing Treyarch and/or Activision?

Call of Duty Black Ops II Xbox 360

Highlighted

Re: Why isn't anyone sueing Treyarch and/or Activision?

in reply to wookie101

wookie101 wrote:

So, as most of you aren't from NZ, but Aus, UK, Asia and US- what do you think?

Lawsuit anyone?

Well, I guess under English law you could make a case that the deceptive advertising (so I heard, I was getting the game with or without Nuketown) procured more sales than they otherwise would have done had the adverts been honest.  Therefore, the companies have gained a monetary advantage via deception.  I didn't follow the advertisements much so I couldn't really comment further.  It is, however, no different to ISPs saying this up to download speeds milarky and they have got away with it for years.  That said, if you feel hard done by from this business decision then vote with your wallet.

Level 31
Likes: 580
Posts: 3202
Registered: ‎28-03-2012

Re: Why isn't anyone sueing Treyarch and/or Activision?

in reply to wookie101

Ridiculous, sorry but it'll never happen. Play the game or don't play the game it's pretty simple. The lawsuit topic has been done to death.

Level 2
Likes: 12
Posts: 52
Registered: ‎08-05-2013

Re: Why isn't anyone sueing Treyarch and/or Activision?

in reply to wookie101

Exactly what damages would you sue for?  The map didn't cost you any extra money.  Therefore you didn't lose anything and are entitled to nothing.

Level 12
Likes: 156
Posts: 488
Registered: ‎01-11-2012

Studios