i dont really recall whinning, i was actually talking about the smg whinners
and of course you can add a lazer sight to a AR
but 9 times out of 10 whos gonna win a CQB.. an AR or an SMG both with lazer sight on? your smart right? you can figure it out
so much for your logic
i just finished getting the smr to gold in hc, i always hip fire, win most of my 1-1 encounters with smgs too
might also mention the smr was on single fire.. so erm yeah
It makes more sense being an attachment, as thats what a laser sight helps with; fact is that Treyarch did a good job seperating things that affect the weapon to what affects the player, and this is what it should have always been.
Agreed. It still takes up a point on the CAC and as an SMG user I can think of plenty of other attachments that are far more valuable than the Laser Sight.
I think it works better as an attachment than a perk. But i do think that the accuracy and the effectiveness of hipfiring in this game is terribly to good.
I think it's fine as is. I think BO2 is pretty balanced overall despite the lag/hit detection problem.
I have no problem raping with any class of guns when I get a good lobby/host.
If they do anyhing it needs to be toned down a bit.. attachment..perk whatever. Maybe its just me but it seems a bit ridiculous. Just my opinion. Skill. .haha what a joke.