Why isn't anyone sueing Treyarch and/or Activision?

Black Ops II Xbox 360

Highlighted

Re: Why isn't anyone sueing Treyarch and/or Activi...

in reply to wookie101

wookie101 wrote:

So, as most of you aren't from NZ, but Aus, UK, Asia and US- what do you think?

Lawsuit anyone?

Well, I guess under English law you could make a case that the deceptive advertising (so I heard, I was getting the game with or without Nuketown) procured more sales than they otherwise would have done had the adverts been honest.  Therefore, the companies have gained a monetary advantage via deception.  I didn't follow the advertisements much so I couldn't really comment further.  It is, however, no different to ISPs saying this up to download speeds milarky and they have got away with it for years.  That said, if you feel hard done by from this business decision then vote with your wallet.

SitRepPro
Likes: 581
Posts: 3202

Re: Why isn't anyone sueing Treyarch and/or Activi...

in reply to wookie101

Ridiculous, sorry but it'll never happen. Play the game or don't play the game it's pretty simple. The lawsuit topic has been done to death.

JunkChunk
Likes: 12
Posts: 52

Re: Why isn't anyone sueing Treyarch and/or Activi...

in reply to wookie101

Exactly what damages would you sue for?  The map didn't cost you any extra money.  Therefore you didn't lose anything and are entitled to nothing.

UncleFizer
Likes: 156
Posts: 488

Studios