What do you consider a good k/d in this game?

Black Ops II Xbox 360

There has been a discussion about this for previous CODs and each one there seems to be different opinions as to what is considered a good k/d.  Mine was much higher in MW3 than this game.  I think most people would say the same thing.  IMO MW3 was a much easier game to get a high k/d.

I consider a good k/d, meaning someone that is truly a good player and has decent games the majority of the time to be about 1.6+. 

I consider myself a decent player, able to pull positive nearly every match on a decent connection, my tdm kd is 1.45.   Although I haven't even reached level 55 yet, (I just got the game for Xmas).  I feel like it will improve over time as I get the feel for the game.   My ratios for the previous games are as follows:

MW- 1.65

MW3-2.23

BO-1.70

BO2-1.45

Clearly we can see which game was easiest.

I'm just curious as to what do you guys consider a good kd and how does your bo2 kd compare with mw3. 

Also I do realize that it is hard to judge someone in the lobby based solely on kd, but it is a pretty good indicator.  

FURIO1
Likes: 8
Posts: 47
Registered: ‎04-01-2013
15 REPLIES 15

I consider anything over 2k/d to be good!

xMORRlSx
Likes: 14
Posts: 108
Registered: ‎30-11-2011

Yeah, anything around 2 is good

MrCoates28210
Likes: 20
Posts: 132
Registered: ‎15-08-2012

Play for fun. Your kd is average, nothing special. I have no problem making average players go negative.

Youngnoble
Likes: 19
Posts: 104
Registered: ‎20-06-2012

KD in itself is meaningless.  It's a stat that too can manipulated too easily.

WL is a better stat as it gives an indication of how wel a team player you are, but you have take it also with a grain of salt, because joining losing games in progress does affect your WL ratio without you having much influence on it.

Cowboy_Torry1
Likes: 19
Posts: 71
Registered: ‎23-12-2012

Also not playing with a full team can affect your WL.  Several times I have been like 30-5 and still lost the game due to teammates.  So no I disagree that WL is a better stat, at least in TDM.   KD is everything in tdm, even if a guys spm is 100, we know he camps but he helps the team with his 2 kd. 

FURIO1
Likes: 8
Posts: 47
Registered: ‎04-01-2013

stats only mean something if its a level playing field like an experiment otherwise like this its a waste of time

xxlNFECTlOUSxx
Likes: 3
Posts: 33
Registered: ‎13-06-2012

I always laugh when i hear that K/D ratio is meaningless. In objectives games, YES it is meaningless to a certain point. But in TDM, it is the essence of the game, If you got 0.25 ratio with 4 kills 12 deaths, You are making your team loses. The main objectives of TDM is to get more kills than deaths.

But first, have fun.

fulsome69
Likes: 2
Posts: 7
Registered: ‎18-08-2011

W/L is meaningless unless you play in a party or play FFA. Overall the average K/D is around 0.9, but I consider lower to mid one K/Ds bad.

Skello1O
Likes: 7
Posts: 44
Registered: ‎05-08-2012

Anything over 1,000. Yes, 1,000. If anyone has below that, even a 999 K/D, you're bad kid.

Film_Not_Rated
Likes: 171
Posts: 1191
Registered: ‎08-03-2012

Studios