Should Hip firing be a perk?

Black Ops II Xbox 360

Re: Should Hip firing be a perk?

in reply to Err0r_6_

Err0r_6_ wrote:

i dont really recall whinning, i was actually talking about the smg whinners

and of course you can add a lazer sight to a AR

but 9 times out of 10 whos gonna win a CQB..  an AR or an SMG both with lazer sight on? your smart right? you can figure it out

so much for your logic 

i just finished getting the smr to gold in hc, i always hip fire, win most of my 1-1 encounters with smgs too

might also mention the smr was on single fire.. so erm yeah

Maccabi Level 75
Likes: 4389
Posts: 15934

Re: Should Hip firing be a perk?

in reply to BMooch11

It makes more sense being an attachment, as thats what a laser sight helps with; fact is that Treyarch did a good job seperating things that affect the weapon to what affects the player, and this is what it should have always been.

dstr001
Likes: 405
Posts: 3723

Re: Should Hip firing be a perk?

in reply to dstr001

Agreed.  It still takes up a point on the CAC and as an SMG user I can think of plenty of other attachments that are far more valuable than the Laser Sight.

avngr9
Likes: 49
Posts: 854

Re: Should Hip firing be a perk?

in reply to BMooch11

I think it works better as an attachment than a perk. But i do think that the accuracy and the effectiveness of hipfiring in this game is terribly to good. 

Rize_BHo
Likes: 128
Posts: 838

Re: Should Hip firing be a perk?

in reply to BMooch11

I think it's fine as is. I think BO2 is pretty balanced overall despite the lag/hit detection problem.

I have no problem raping with any class of guns when I get a good lobby/host.

HairyBubba1963
Likes: 134
Posts: 244

Re: Should Hip firing be a perk?

in reply to BMooch11

If they do anyhing it needs to be toned down a bit.. attachment..perk whatever. Maybe its just me but it seems a bit ridiculous. Just my opinion. Skill. .haha what a joke.

rootdawg
Likes: 3
Posts: 18

Studios